Global-hukumindonesia.id, Nigeria - The headline, “Tinubu Campaigners Told to Stop Campaigning in North as South Protests ‘Tinubu Must Go,’” reflects growing political frustration, but it does not fully capture the diversity of opinion across Northern Nigeria.
While some voters may oppose President Bola Tinubu’s administration over economic hardship, insecurity, unemployment, and rising living costs, others may assess candidates primarily through the lens of policy credibility, national inclusion, and security. For these voters, Governor Donald Duke’s appeal would depend less on regional identity and more on whether his proposed agenda addresses the North’s most urgent challenges.
Duke’s stated commitment to fighting insurgency, strengthening the rule of law, expanding education, and developing infrastructure could attract attention in northern communities affected by insecurity and underdevelopment. A credible plan for agriculture, mineral development, job creation, and investment in northern regions would also be central to winning public confidence.
His perceived political neutrality may further distinguish him from candidates viewed as strongly associated with ethnic, religious, or regional blocs. A candidate who presents himself as nationally focused—rather than as the representative of one section of the country—could appeal to voters seeking stability and broader inclusion.
However, neutrality alone would not secure northern support. Northern voters would likely demand specific commitments: improved security, investment in education, support for farmers and pastoral communities, expanded healthcare, and meaningful representation in national decision-making. They would also expect clear evidence that Duke’s record in Cross River State can translate into effective national governance.
The emerging political lesson is that opposition to one candidate does not automatically amount to support for another. If Duke seeks meaningful support in the North, his campaign must present detailed, measurable policies and engage communities respectfully rather than relying on endorsements, symbolism, or anti-incumbency sentiment.
The North’s response, therefore, may be neither an automatic rejection of Tinubu nor an automatic embrace of Duke. It is more likely to be shaped by security, economic opportunity, fairness, and the credibility of each candidate’s commitment to national unity. (Mr. Chen/Raden M Yahya Jaya)


Social Header